The evidence must be presented to me. On my past can also be judged by their own, as others can be judged the same. But all this must be presumed that the inference that is opposite to the perception is a standard that has some non-individual right or wrong. If any of my inferences are as good as any other reasoning, then Plato's anarchy of the knowledge deduced from Protagoras is indeed in fact. So at this point of importance, Plato seems to be right. But the empiricists have to say that perception is the touchstone of the correctness of the empirical material in the test inference. (3) The theory of universal rheology is distorted by 公司介绍:

　　金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年，是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚，各专业技术人员齐全，服务周到及时，可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计；以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长，已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

　　公司服务范围:概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　生态农业项目规划设计、 旅游观光项目规划设计、城乡建造规划设计、 住宅小区规划设计、物流园区规划设计、养老项目规划设计、景观设计项目规划、道路绿化规划设计、河道整治规划项目 、美丽乡村规划设计、酒店规划设计、医院规划设计、学校规划设计等规划文本

　　公司:金兰企划

　　云南省十三五规划摘要:Plato, and it is hard to imagine that anyone else has advocated the extreme form that Plato has given to it. For example, let's assume that the colors we see are constantly changing. "

　　But if we say "I see the red", we have no reason to think that in the whole period of time we say this, it should not be true. "Plato is The use of some logical opposition, such as seeing, not knowing, and knowing, is applied to a changing process and to obtain his results, but these antagonisms do not apply to the process of describing such a class.It is assumed that in a foggy In the day, you watched a man walk down the road from your side: he became more and more blurry, and finally at a time you could be sure that you could not see him, but there was a puzzling middle The logic of opposition is created for our convenience, but not

　　The change requires a measure of the tool, while Plato has ignored this possibility. So he said about the subject, most of them are irrelevant. At the same time, we must admit that unless the words have certain meaning within certain limits, the discussion will be impossible. However, here we are also very easy to be too absolute. The meaning of the text is indeed a change, we may wish to "concept" as an example. Only after considerable education, we learned to give the word to some kind of meaning that Plato had given it. It is necessary that the change of the meaning of the text should lag behind the changes described in the text; but the meaning of the text should not be changed, but it is not necessary. Maybe that's not it