The nature of certain concepts, just as "ten" is a nature of the concept of "my finger". But if it is to argue that "the earth has a satellite, that is, the moon, so the moon is one", it is necessary to argue that "the apostle is twelve, Peter is the apostle; so Peter is twelve" is the same bad; but if we "White" to replace "twelve", then this argument will be effective. The above study shows that, although there is a form of knowledge, that is, logic and mathematics, is not derived from the perception; but Plato's argument about all other knowledge is false. Of course, this does not prove that his conclusion is false; it only proves that Plato does not make a valid reason to assume that his conclusion is true. (2) Let me now turn to Proctogue's argument that man is the measure of all things, or - as explained by everyone - everyone

　　公司介绍:

　　金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年，是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚，各专业技术人员齐全，服务周到及时，可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计；以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长，已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

　　公司服务范围:概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　生态农业项目规划设计、 旅游观光项目规划设计、城乡建造规划设计、 住宅小区规划设计、物流园区规划设计、养老项目规划设计、景观设计项目规划、道路绿化规划设计、河道整治规划项目 、美丽乡村规划设计、酒店规划设计、医院规划设计、学校规划设计等规划文本

　　公司:金兰企划

　　云南省十三五规划摘要:Is the scale of all things. The most fundamental point here is that we have to decide at what level the discussion is taking place. Obviously, we must first distinguish between perception and inference. In the sense of perception, a person is inevitably limited to his own perceptions; he knows what other people know, and he knows it by his own perception and hearing. The consciousness of the dreamer and the madman, as a matter of consciousness, is just as the perception of others is the same; the only refutation for them is that because of their unusual contact before and after, they are likely to cause false conclusions. But what about the inference? Are they also personal and private? In a sense, we must admit that they are also. What I am

　　The letter must be due to something that can make me believe. Indeed, my reason can be another person's assertion, and it can also be perfectly justified, for example - I am a judge who is listening to the testimony. But no matter how I might be a Protocetian believer, it would be reasonable for a certain set of images I would rather accept the advice of a narrator than my own opinion; for I will repeat If I do not agree with him at first, as long as you can be careful to prove that he is right. In this sense, I can admit that another person is more intelligent than me. Proctogore's argument, if given a proper explanation, does not contain a view that I will never make mistakes, but only that I am wrong