Proof of argument) is also important. Assuming you say "the lion is there, but there is no kylin," you can take him to the zoo and say "see, this is the lion"; and prove your argument with the lion The But unless you are a philosopher, you will not add: "Now you can see that it is there." But if you are a philosopher and really added that, then you are talking about meaningless words. That "there is a lion", that is, "for a suitable x, 'x is a lion' is true." But we can not talk about a suitable x, saying it "exists"; We can only apply this verb to a complete or incomplete description. "Lion" is an incomplete description, because it can be applied to many objects: "The zoo's most

　　公司介绍:

　　金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年，是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚，各专业技术人员齐全，服务周到及时，可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计；以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长，已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

　　公司服务范围:概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　生态农业项目规划设计、 旅游观光项目规划设计、城乡建造规划设计、 住宅小区规划设计、物流园区规划设计、养老项目规划设计、景观设计项目规划、道路绿化规划设计、河道整治规划项目 、美丽乡村规划设计、酒店规划设计、医院规划设计、学校规划设计等规划文本

　　公司:金兰企划

　　云南省十三五规划摘要:Big lion "is a complete description, because it can only be applied to an object. Now suppose I am watching a bright red.I can say" this is my current perception ", I can also say" my current perception exists "But I can not say," This is there, "because the word" exists "is meaningful only when it is used in a description that is opposed to a name. One of the things that is perceived in the object .1 For the subject, see the last chapter of the book. Now I will talk about the understanding of the number. There are two very different things to consider here: On the other hand is the empirical proposition on the count. "2 + 2 = 4" belongs to the former; "I have ten fingers

　　I should agree with Plato's argument that arithmetic and general pure mathematics do not come from consciousness, and pure mathematics contains synonymous repetitions like "man is man", but usually only But it is more complicated to know.To know whether a mathematical proposition is correct, we do not need to study the world, but only to study the meaning of symbols; and symbols, when we omitted after the definition (its purpose is to simplify), just Is the word "or" and "not" and "everything" and "some" and so on, and these words are not like "Socrates", they do not indicate anything in the real world. A mathematical equation Affirming that the two sets of symbols have the same meaning; as long as we limit ourselves to purely mathematical range, this meaning must be a meaning that we do not need to know anything that can be perceived.