"Object", so it is considered by us to be physical; and by the words and memories filled with the perception becomes a "perception", it becomes a "subject" part, and we think it is psychological of. Perception is only an event, neither true nor false; but the words to enrich the perception is a judge, you can have true or false. This judgment is called "perception judgment". The meaning of "knowledge is consciousness" must be interpreted as "knowledge is consciousness judgment". It is only in this form may be grammar is correct. And then back to similar and not similar problems up; when I was aware of the two colors, it is very likely that their similarity and dissimilarity are part of the feeling and material, and can be used to confirm the perception to be sure. Plato's argument is that we do not have sensory organs that can be perceived similarly and not similar

　　,公司介绍:

　　金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年，是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚，各专业技术人员齐全，服务周到及时，可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计；以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长，已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

　　公司服务范围:概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　生态农业项目规划设计、 旅游观光项目规划设计、城乡建造规划设计、 住宅小区规划设计、物流园区规划设计、养老项目规划设计、景观设计项目规划、道路绿化规划设计、河道整治规划项目 、美丽乡村规划设计、酒店规划设计、医院规划设计、学校规划设计等规划文本

　　公司:金兰企划

　　云南省十三五规划摘要:Which is ignoring the cerebral cortex and that all sensory organs must be on the surface of the body. The argument that similarity and dissimilarity are considered to be included in the possible perception and material are as follows. Suppose we see two colors A and B, assuming we judge "A and B similar". Let us further assume that such judgments are as correct as Plato's, and that in particular, it is correct in the circumstances we are investigating. So there is a similar relationship between A and B, and not just from our side to determine the similarity or not when a judge. Because if only we have to judge, then it will be an arbitrary judgment, and can not have true or false. Since it is clearly possible to have true or false, the similarity exists between A and B, not just some "mental" thing. "A and B similar" This judgment is true (

　　If it is true), but because there is a "fact", just as "A is red" or "A is round" this judgment is the same. The perception of similarity is not more than the perception of color by the mind. I now talk about the existence, which is Plato is extremely emphasized. He said that with regard to voices and colors we have an idea that can contain both, that is, they exist. There is something that belongs to everything, and one of those things that the mind itself can know; it is impossible to reach the truth without reaching it. Here we argue against Plato's argument, which is totally different from the argument that is similar to the above. The argument here is that Plato's bad words about the existence of all words are bad grammar. This is not only important to Plato's relationship, but also for other topics (such as the existence of God