The sensory organs can perceive both. And no special organs can be perceived "general existence and non-existence, similarity and dissimilarity, the same and different and one and more." Similarly also applies to honor and not honor, good and bad. "The mind is thinking about something through its own function, but the rest of the things are passed through the body." We perceive hard and soft by touch, but judging their existence and the antagonism between them is the mind. Only the mind can reach the existence; but if we can not achieve the existence, we can not achieve the truth. So we can not only through the senses and cognitive things, because alone through the senses we can not know whether things exist. So knowledge is thinking rather than the impression, and perception is not knowledge; because the perception "since it can not know the existence, so it is not true for the understanding of the truth

　　公司介绍:

　　金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年，是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚，各专业技术人员齐全，服务周到及时，可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计；以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长，已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

　　公司服务范围:概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　生态农业项目规划设计、 旅游观光项目规划设计、城乡建造规划设计、 住宅小区规划设计、物流园区规划设计、养老项目规划设计、景观设计项目规划、道路绿化规划设计、河道整治规划项目 、美丽乡村规划设计、酒店规划设计、医院规划设计、学校规划设计等规划文本

　　公司:金兰企划

　　云南省十三五规划摘要:The It is not easy to discern what is acceptable and which must be rejected in this argument that is equal to knowledge, and that Plato's discussion of three interrelated topics, namely, (1) knowledge is (2) man is the scale of all things; (3) all things are in a state of rheology. (1) the first topic (Plato's argument mainly involves only this topic) in addition to what we have just talked about the last It is argued that the law of comparison, the knowledge of existence, and the understanding of numbers, are the most essential things for knowledge, but that is, These can not be included in the perception, because they are not produced by any sensory organs. On these, we have to talk about the following things are different. Let us start with similar and not similar to start.

　　Suppose there are two colors, both of which I have seen, whether they are similar or not, but they are all me, in my case, should be accepted, and indeed not as a "perception" But as a "perception of judgment" to accept. I should say that perception is not knowledge, but merely an event that occurs; it belongs equally to both the physical world and the psychological world. We naturally, like Plato, want to perceive consciousness as a relationship between the perception and the object: we say "I see a table". But here the "I" and "table" is the logical structure. The core of the unprocessed thing here is just the color of some of the fragments. These colors are combined with tactile images, which can cause words and can be the source of memory. The sensation filled with the tactile image becomes one