It will no longer be white. It is not right to say that we are seeing an object, because we see that we are constantly becoming invisible. (1) If everything is changed in all ways, then there is no right to see it as being seen and not called invisible, or perceived as consciousness rather than being unconscious. And when we say "perception is knowledge", we also can say that "perception is non-knowledge." (1) It is impossible for the young people who are either Plato or who are active in Ephesus, who have not noticed, that it is impossible to move in the extreme Heraklit's doctrine. The movement requires a thing A, sometimes here at all times; but when it moves, it must always be the same thing. In Plato

　　公司介绍:

　　金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年，是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚，各专业技术人员齐全，服务周到及时，可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计；以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长，已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

　　公司服务范围:概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　生态农业项目规划设计、 旅游观光项目规划设计、城乡建造规划设计、 住宅小区规划设计、物流园区规划设计、养老项目规划设计、景观设计项目规划、道路绿化规划设计、河道整治规划项目 、美丽乡村规划设计、酒店规划设计、医院规划设计、学校规划设计等规划文本

　　公司:金兰企划

　　云南省十三五规划摘要:The examination of the theory of both the nature of the changes have the location of the changes, but no real changes. In this respect, modern quantum physics runs far more far than the most extreme of Heraclitus in the Platonic era. Plato would have thought it was a fatal injury to science, but it has proved that it is not so. ① can be compared with the following advertising: "Mobil Shell, always unchanged." The above argument is tantamount to saying that there may be other things in the constant rheology, but the meaning of the word, at least for a certain period of time, must be fixed; otherwise there is no argument to be determined, and No assertion is true rather than fake. If the discussion and knowledge are possible, there must be something that is more or less constant. I think it should be recognized. But most of the rheology is consistent with this recognition. Talking about here,

　　Plato refused to discuss Parmenides on the grounds that Parmenides were so great and too noble. He is a "awesome character". "He has a very noble depth." He is "one of my most respected people". Plato's words show that he loves a static universe, and that he does not like the kind of Heraklite-style rheology that he has ever recognized for the sake of argument. But after expressing this tribute, he tried to avoid playing Parmenides' theory in lieu of Heraclitus. Let's talk about Plato's last argument that knowledge is equal to consciousness. He first pointed out that we were through the eyes and ears to consciousness, rather than with the eyes and ears in the perception; so he continued to point out that some of our knowledge is not associated with any sensory organs. For example, we can know that the sound and color are not the same, although there is no sense of any kind