The greatest, the best, the finest, the most complete, the only day that was created. It is difficult to know in the "Timaiu chapter", which should be taken seriously, which should be seen as a fantasy game. I think that the idea of ​​creating creation as a form of chaos is to be treated very seriously; the proportions between the four elements and their triangles for the regular polyhedron and their constituent parts Relationship should also be the case. The same is true of the view that time and space are clearly what Plato believes in, and that the created world is seen as a copy of the eternal archetypes. The world is mixed with the inevitable and purpose, as early as the rise of philosophy before the fact that all the Greeks actually

　　公司介绍:

　　金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年，是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚，各专业技术人员齐全，服务周到及时，可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计；以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长，已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

　　公司服务范围:概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　生态农业项目规划设计、 旅游观光项目规划设计、城乡建造规划设计、 住宅小区规划设计、物流园区规划设计、养老项目规划设计、景观设计项目规划、道路绿化规划设计、河道整治规划项目 、美丽乡村规划设计、酒店规划设计、医院规划设计、学校规划设计等规划文本

　　公司:金兰企划

　　云南省十三五规划摘要:Some kind of faith. Plato accepted it, thus avoiding the sin that had bothered the Christian theology. I think his world - the animal's argument is serious. But with regard to the details of the reincarnation and the parts of the gods and other unimportant points, I think it is only inserted in order to illustrate a possible specific content. Because of its great influence on ancient and medieval ideas, the whole dialogue, as I have already said, deserves to be studied; and this influence is by no means limited to its least part of fantasy. The 18th of the Platonic philosophy of knowledge and perception of the vast majority of modern people believe that the knowledge of the experience must rely on, or from the perception of the "knowledge of the history of Western philosophy" , But for granted. However in the Pla

　　Recognize as well as perception. Agree with this point, so the original definition is also in this limit was amended. Secondly, we will talk about the criticism of the Heraklitian doctrine. It is said that according to the practice of his disciples in the middle of the handsome young people of Ephesus, this was initially pushed to the extreme. Everything can be changed in two ways, one is movement, one is the nature of the change; and rheological doctrine is that everything is always in both these aspects of change. And not only everything is going through a qualitative change forever, and everything is always changing all of its own nature - it is said that the wise man of Ephesus is such an idea. This creates a very awkward consequence. We can not say "it is white", because if we start to say this when it is white, but before we finished this sentence,