您的位置:商铺首页 >> 行业资讯 >> 详情

大理州 农业观光项目概念性规划设计

时间:2017-03-23 14:33

  The The sun, the moon, the French, Napoleon, etc., are unique; these names can be applied without many examples. On the other hand as "cat" "dog" "people" such words, then apply to many different things. The question of commonality is to explore the meaning of these words, as well as the meaning of these adjectives like "white" and "hard" and "round". He said: "The word" co-phase "in my meaning refers to something of a nature that can be used to describe many subjects, and the term 'individual' in my meaning means something that can not be described 17a. A nomenclature refers to something "entity", and an adjective or class name (such as "human" or "person") refers to something called "common" The The entity is

  公司介绍:

  金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年,是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚,各专业技术人员齐全,服务周到及时,可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计;以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长,已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

  公司服务范围:概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

  生态农业项目规划设计、 旅游观光项目规划设计、城乡建造规划设计、 住宅小区规划设计、物流园区规划设计、养老项目规划设计、景观设计项目规划、道路绿化规划设计、河道整治规划项目 、美丽乡村规划设计、酒店规划设计、医院规划设计、学校规划设计等规划文本

  公司:金兰企划

  云南省十三五规划摘要:"This", and the commonality is "this type" - it refers to the kind of things rather than the actual special things. The common is not an entity, because it is not "this". (Plato's heavenly bed is also a "this" for those who can see it; but this is where Aristotle does not agree with Plato.) Aristotle says, "It is impossible for any common noun to become an entity's name, because it is something that is unique to it, and it does not belong to anything else; Phase is common, because it is called the kind of thing that can belong to more than one thing. " In this regard, the essence of this argument is that the common can not exist, but only exist

  Special things. Aristotle's doctrine is extremely smooth on the surface. Suppose I say "there is such a thing as a football match", most people will think that this is a clear truth. But if I mean that football can exist without football players, I will be very legitimate to be said to be meaningless words. In the same way, people will think of such a thing as a parent, but that is because there are many parents; there is such a thing as sweetness, but that is because there are many sweet things; red, but only because There are many red things. And this dependency is thought to be not mutual: the people who play football never kicked football, but they still exist; usually sweet things can become