Good at detail and criticism; but because of the lack of basic clarity and giant firepower, so he did not make a great job of construction work. It is difficult for us to decide where we should begin to describe Aristotle's metaphysics, perhaps the best place to begin with his criticism of the idea and his own set of other commonalities. He put forward a lot of good arguments to oppose the idea, most of which have been discussed in Plato's Parmenides. The strongest argument is the "third man" argument: that is, if a person is a person because he is like the ideal person, then there must be another more ideal person, and ordinary people and ideals Of people should be like this more ideal person. Second, Sue Graham

　　公司介绍:

　　金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年，是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚，各专业技术人员齐全，服务周到及时，可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计；以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长，已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

　　公司服务范围:概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　生态农业项目规划设计、 旅游观光项目规划设计、城乡建造规划设计、 住宅小区规划设计、物流园区规划设计、养老项目规划设计、景观设计项目规划、道路绿化规划设计、河道整治规划项目 、美丽乡村规划设计、酒店规划设计、医院规划设计、学校规划设计等规划文本

　　公司:金兰企划

　　云南省十三五规划摘要:The end is both a person and an animal, so there is a problem, that is, the ideal person is not an ideal animal; if so, then the number of animals, the number of ideal animals must have. We do not have to worry about this; because Aristotle has made it clear that when there are several individuals sharing the same predicate, it can not be because of their kind of things with their kind of relationship, And must be due to their relationship to something more desirable. This can be roughly considered to be conclusive, but Aristotle's own doctrine is very clear. It is this lack of clarity that makes it possible for the medieval nominalists to argue with the apologists. Aristotle's metaphysics, broadly speaking, can be described as Plato, which is diluted by common sense. Aristotle is hard to understand

　　For Plato and common sense is not easy to blending together. When we try to understand him, sometimes we think he is showing a common view of people who do not understand philosophy, and sometimes we think he is using a new vocabulary in the clarification of Platonism. Too much emphasis on a single paragraph is not enough, because in another paragraph will have a correction or amendment to it. In general, the easiest way to understand his theory of coexistence and his form and material is to first put the half of the common sense sense in his point of view and then consider what he is doing Platonic correction. Within a certain limit, the common phase theory is very simple. In the language, there are nouns and adjectives. A noun is applied to "things" or "people", and each of them is the only thing or person to which the noun applies