Learn to be skeptical But mathematics, under the influence of Pythagoras, was much more prosperous in the great Greek than in Ionia; yet the mathematics of that era was confused with mysticism. Parmenides were influenced by Pythagoras, but the extent to which this effect was reached was speculated. Parmenides was important in history because he created a metaphysical form of argument that existed in different forms in the later majority of metaphysics, until Hegel, and included Hegel himself. People often say that he has created the logic, but he really created is based on the logic of metaphysics. ① refers to the Greek colonies in southern Italy. - Chinese translation of the editor of Parmenides

　　公司介绍:

　　金兰企业策划有限公司成立于2006年，是集城乡规划编制、建筑工程设计、市政工程设计、风景园林设计为一体的大型工程设计企业。公司技术力量雄厚，各专业技术人员齐全，服务周到及时，可提供从城乡规划编制到建筑设计、市政设计、风景园林设计等各类工程的设计、咨询、服务等。公司项目涉及旅游、农业、酒店、餐饮、医疗、教育、居住、养老、办公、商业、法院、工业厂房等多种类型建筑设计；以及城乡规划编制、生态农业项目规划、旅游项目规划、地产项目规划、产业园区项目规划等全方位的设计工作。近年来公司主营业务不断增长，已成为国内最具影响力的设计品牌之一。

　　公司服务范围:

　　生态农业项目规划设计: 概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　旅游观光项目规划设计: 概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　景观项目规划设计: 概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　城乡建造规划设计: 概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　市政项目规划设计: 概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　产业园区建设项目规划设计: 概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　住宅小区建设项目规划设计: 概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　商务楼房建设项目规划设计: 概念性规划、总体规划、详细规划、规划设计文本

　　公司:金兰企划

　　贵州省十三五规划摘要:Feelings. But it is easy for us to put forward a rule that excludes these exceptions, and in the rest of the case you can use any descriptive statement that can only be used in Washington instead of George Washington. And only by virtue of these words, we know that we know him. Parmenides argues that since we are now able to know what is usually considered to be the past, then it can not be in the past, and it must be in a sense. So he argues that there is no such thing as the change. What we have said about George Washington can solve this argument. In a sense, we can say that we do not have knowledge of the past. When you think about it, think back

　　Appear in the present, but the recall does not mean to be recalled things. However, the recall provides a description of the events of the past, and for the most practical purpose, there is no need to distinguish between the description and the description of things. The whole argument is to explain how easy it is to draw metaphysical conclusions from the language and why the only way to avoid this fallacy is to push the study of the logical and psychological aspects of language more than most metaphysics Made a step further. However, if I think Parmenides if the resurrection, read what I said, he would think it is very superficial. He will ask, "How do you know that your account of Washington is referring to the past? According to your own argument, the direct inference must be